HomeFaresBuying your rail ticket online could cost you nearly double

Comments

Buying your rail ticket online could cost you nearly double — 9 Comments

  1. As at 1030 on 30 December, National Rail are now saying that the Cheapest Fare is a FIRST CLASS Off Peak Return at £17.50 !

    Funny how these blunders are never in the passenger’s favour…

  2. The First Class Off-Peak return is offered if you select both Standard and First Class fares in “Show the Cheapest”. In addition, if you select “with Travelcard” then the correct Travelcard prices are offered according to the time of day. So the National Rail Enquiries system seems to know about off-peak periods – it just does not know that there are any Standard-class off-peak rail-only fares from Sevenoaks and some other stations.

  3. A website blunder in the passenger’s favour would probably lead to a ticket that would not pass the gates or stand scrutiny from the Revenue Protection Officers.

  4. It turns out that National Rail are fully aware that their website is ripping off passengers ! An honest company would suspend the ticket selling facility the moment they knew of any malfunction, but National Rail only hint that there’s a problem if you happen to click on the Status icon.

    Even then, the notification is hopelessly vague. It says merely that ‘Fares for this journey may be showing incorrectly’, with no warning that passengers will be massively overcharged by being offered only The Wrong Kind Of Ticket.

  5. That’s the “fix” introduced after last year’s fares rip-off!

    You will notice that the (well-hidden) “warning” does not appear on the incorrect fares for Tuesday 12 January – see http://ojp.nationalrail.co.uk/service/timesandfares/SEV/London/120116/0915/dep/120116/1400/dep – and does not appear on the incorrect fares for the trains today unaffected by the London Bridge work (for instance the xx00 and xx30 Thameslink services to Blackfriars). It may be that National Rail Enquiries think that the problem only affects the special timetable – it doesn’t

  6. It really is time that the “National Conditions of Carriage” were consigned to the circular floor-mounted filing cabinet, and that the rail operators became subject to standard consumer protection legislation. Not that that would help much with understaffed Trading Standards departments only actioning really gross violations, if you’re lucky.
    It’s all just like the Bad Old Days when hospital kitchens could avoid food hygiene regulations by dint of “Crown Immunity”

  7. The DfT’s so-called “consultation” is straight out of “Yes, Prime Minister”.

    It was so Top Secret that it attracted just 31 responses, of whom a mere seven were private individuals.

    And a year later they’re still “analysing your feedback” !

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>