HomeTrainsOffpeak services from Sevenoaks to Charing Cross virtually halved

Comments

Offpeak services from Sevenoaks to Charing Cross virtually halved — 9 Comments

  1. I saw the cancelled 17.59 go through Sevenoaks at 18.01 on Thursday night. Shameful.

  2. From my point of view the most annoying thing about this is that one of the (temporarily) axed services is the 0929 which is the first offpeak train from Sevenoaks and the first on which non-folding bikes can be taken. We will now have to wait for the 0944, which, if it starts at Tunbridge Wells, may well not have proper bike storage.

  3. @kirsty Unfortunately you may be right. The Tunbridge Wells services tend to be operated with the “Networker” suburban stock rather than the “Electrostar” long distance stock.

  4. I think that in the Hastings area there is a wish for a faster service, so if they can run them non-stop now then they could do this more. Part of the problem is that stops at Sevenoaks and Orpington in the shoulder peak lead to overcrowding on Hastings Line services. Sevenoaks and Orpington have lots of other trains. The service on the Hastings Line has got so slow and sluggish that many people on the coast in Hastings and Bexhill have taken to travelling via Ashford and HS1 because it’s quicker and more reliable.

  5. @Richard M Part of our point is that although there are other fast services from Sevenoaks they run in pairs 5 minutes apart, so not stopping the Hastings services leaves 25 minutes in between services.

  6. Yes I can see that must be quite irksome… A longer term solution if the Hastings Line services were accelerated could be to re-time the Canterbury Wests so they are 15 mins apart from the Tunbridge Wells trains maintaining a quarter-hourly service.

  7. The desire from Hastings line travellers for faster services is fully understandable. Unfortunately, even with a 15 minute clockface service for Sevenoaks, running Hastings trains fast between Tonbridge and London could well leave the remaining four services full and standing from Sevenoaks while the Hastings train rushes through with numerous empty seats. Some years ago the peak services from Ashford ran fast between Tonbridge and London with spare capacity. We calculated that each morning’s empty seats amounted to the equivalent of an empty 12 coach train passing Sevenoaks. I fear fast services between Tonbridge and London from the Hastings line may fall foul of the same problem.

  8. The IKF timetable recast of Dec 2008 offered nothing to the Hastings Line (or the Maidstone Line for that matter). Whereas east and north Kent gained new high speed services (albeit at premium fares), and inner and outer suburban routes generally a quarter-hourly service or better, the line south of Tunbridge Wells was something of an afterthought, extending two rather sluggish outer-suburban ‘metro’ services. Frant, Wadhurst,Stonegate and Etchingham have haemorrhaged business to the Uckfield line which offers a similar level of service but with fares 40% cheaper. Many travellers from Hastings and Bexhill either use the Southern route (cheaper) or go via Ashford and HS1 (faster). The service is also unfit for purpose in generating contraflow inbound leisure and tourist traffic to the coast. It may be in the longer term with Marshlink electrification and upgrade that this becomes the main route (potentially offering a journey time Hastings – St Pancras of 68 mins, as opposed to 100 mins+ to Charing Cross. In the meantime, there is definitely a feeling that something must be done.

  9. The answer to this might be to recast the timetable so that the two Canterbury Wests, one stopping Hastings, two Tunbridge Wells, offer a limited stop between to London Charing Cross every 12 minutes. This would offer us a turn and up go LOROL type service in contrast to the large gaps seen today between bunched fast services.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

HTML tags allowed in your comment: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>